Nationalism, the sense of belonging to a particular state, has nowadays become an extremely effective and pervasive a force in the political life of mankind. Nationalism has not only influenced the formation of nation-states but I. Nationalism did not exist in the past, at least in the form in which we find it today. It was during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that nationalism came to be a distinctive force to reckon with.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. Their resentment of multilateral, Should nationalism be suppressed essay institutions is loud, and they make no accommodation for others whose patriotism is seen to be deficient. Nation-centric programs have gained considerable support recently, particularly from older people.
In the United States, in election after election, the Republican Party has enjoyed higher support from older voters ages 65 and above.
About 53 percent of this group voted for Republicans inbut only 37 percent of young adults ages 18 to 29 joined them.
You may opt out or contact us anytime. The young and the old are not only spread differently across the political spectrum, but in certain cases, they also seem to be moving away from each other.
In the United Kingdom, young voters traditionally leaned toward the Labour Party, and older voters toward Conservatives, but, until recently, these differences remained small. Infor example, younger voters were almost evenly split, while older ones favored the Conservatives by 13 points. By last year, however, the political spectrum was much more polarized.
In general elections, Conservatives had a three-point lead in the overall national average. Young voters favored Labour by 51 points above that average, while those over 65 favored Conservatives by 32 points more than the average.
In comparison, six out of 10 seniors ages 65 plus wanted to leave. These observations raise fundamental questions. Why are older populations more prone to nationalism? And how can political strategists take this tendency into consideration?
In explaining nationalist tendencies among the old, it can be tempting to resort to cognitive factors. Thus, nostalgia for the good old days might result from voters confusing the public and personal aspects of the past.
In this case, the relationship between age and nationalism may have something to do with how people deal with risk. Older people are commonly known to be more risk-averse than the young. A recent study provides convincing evidence for this hypothesis.
By using self-reported risk attitudes of a large sample of individuals over years, the study shows that willingness to take risks decreases over the course of life. This reduction is equivalent to a 2. Such an age-driven increase in risk aversion could be explained by biological changes or behavioral adaptation to a shorter lifespan ahead and a longer one behind.
Either way, when nationalism favors the familiar landscape of the past—an asset that is owned disproportionately by the old—and dismisses the uncharted waters of an ever more integrated and diverse world in the future, which comes with unfamiliar faces and change, the outcome is predictable. It could be that the old embrace a more nationalistic position than the young solely because they are risk-averse.
Because nationalist rhetoric often objects to free trade and migration, we should also consider the possibility that nationalist bias among senior citizens stems from economic preferences that change with age.
For instance, the old consume more services like long-term care, while the young consume more goods like smartphones. Therefore, the higher the share of old people in the population, the higher the demand for services which cannot be imported, and the lower the demand for goods that can. In a previous studymy colleagues and I tried to explain how this variation in taste could translate into a more protectionist trade policy in an aging society.
When demographic aging boosts demand for services, which cannot be imported, some domestic firms could cease producing other goods and start providing services, while others might move overseas where demand for their goods remains strong. This shift could be particularly large if trade barriers are low, because those who move overseas could still freely ship back their products to their home market.
The short-termism of nationalist programs should be communicated clearly to all citizens: One may wish to cut in line while others wait, but when everybody does so, nobody gets to eat the cake.Conclusion of a nationalism essay.
You should not only show a clear understanding of the word “nationalism” in your paper but also state your own position in conclusion. While writing a conclusion, try to outline and reemphasize your thesis idea, adding your own thoughts and views on this issue. Nationalism cannot be limited to one definition because there are far too many aspects of nationalism such as cultural, ethnic, civic, relationship to land, etc.
Nationalism can be seen as a double-edged sword which can be used to protect and aid its people. The French Revolution was a time of great change. There is debate over whether nationalism should be suppressed.
Nationalism is defined as devotion and loyalty to one's own country while suppression is synonymous with subdue or stifle.5/5(10).
From this definition, we can deduce the major characteristics of Filipino nationalism for our time. Nationalism is defensive, protective.
Nationalists believe that the resources of our country should be for the benefit of our people today and in the future. Essay Sample Nationalism has been viewed as both a positive and a negative force, and both positions have been demonstrated today and throughout history.
. Short Essay on Nationalism. Nationalism is a concept that involves a feeling of extremely strong attachment towards one’s own country. Due to one or more than one object factors like race, religion, language, literature, culture etc., there grows in a people a strong feeling of like-mindedness which endows them with the quality of nationality.